Big effort is under way to reign in mortgage fraud in Utah
A buyer lies on a loan application. A crook
steals someone's Social Security number and uses
it to buy a home.
Mortgage fraud takes many forms in Utah, one
of the loan fraud capitals of the United States.
It can't get much worse here. According to data
collected by the Mortgage Asset Research Institute,
or MARI, Utah on a per-capita basis ranks second
in the nation for loans originated in 2005 that
contained alleged fraud or serious misrepresentation.
Florida was No. 1.
"Utah's fraud problems have given it a consistently
high ranking despite increased requirements for
professional licensing and education and more
rigorous enforcement," according to the MARI
report.
The high level of fraud has prompted Utah Rep.
Paul Ray to try for a second year to get get the
Legislature to approve a bill aimed at reducing
loan fraud in Utah.
"The focus right now is on violent crimes
and that makes sense because you want dangerous
people off the street," Ray said. "But
we need to put more resources into a crime that
can ruin lives and hurt the entire economy."
Ray's bill, which has yet to be numbered, would
make the act of mortgage fraud a criminal offense.
Typically, the state prosecutes mortgage fraud
by charging people with ancillary offenses, such
as forgery.
His bill, which would classify mortgage fraud
as a second-degree felony, also would assign a
prosecutor and two investigators to this specific
type of crime.
Ray said too many crooks get away with mortgage
fraud. "Mortgage fraud cases have to be extremely
[hard] to get prosecuted because our prosecutors
are so busy," he said.
By various estimates, an array of state and federal
agencies have hundreds of cases of loan fraud
that could be investigated and prosecuted if there
were more resources.
Mortgage fraud certainly aggravates Utah's already
high rate of home foreclosures and bankruptcies.
Mortgages tainted by some type of fraud are much
more likely to end up in default.
As a result, consumers in Utah pay more for their
home loans -- about one-quarter of a percentage
rate higher -- than people in other parts of the
country because of the high level of fraud and
increased risk of default, Ray said.
So why does Utah have such a high rate of fraudulent
activity? No one is sure. One suspicion is that
unscrupulous lenders try to qualify too many heavily
indebted Utah families for homes they cannot afford.
Another is the makeup of Utah's trusting population,
where many people place a great deal of trust
in community and religious leaders and authorities
figures.
Jim Malpede of the FBI in Salt Lake City said
he isn't sure why, but mortgage fraud has worsened
over the past year.
He cites the MARI report. Utah had the third-highest
rate of loan fraud among all states from 2001
to 2003. In 2004, the state slipped to No. 4.
But in 2005 it was back up, this time to No. 2.
"If law enforcement had more resources to
address mortgage fraud in Utah they would be very,
very busy," Malpede said.
His agency has a backlog of cases, though he
is not sure of the exact number. But one thing
is for sure: "We don't have the resources
to investigate all of the allegations of mortgage
fraud we receive," he said.
Kirk Torgensen, chief deputy attorney general,
backs Ray's measure and said his office would
welcome additional resources.
"We want to send a message that mortgage
fraud in the state will be investigated and prosecuted
aggressively," he said.
Although the cases of loan fraud are diverse
in the nature, lately "equity skimming"
seems to be a popular type, said Derek Miller,
director of Utah's Division of Real Estate. In
an equity skimming scheme, crooks buy a home --
many times with someone else's private information.
They then get an inflated appraisal for the property
so they can get cash through a home equity loan.
Then they disappear.
Ray's bill, if passed, would be one of many measures
designed to address the problem of loan fraud
that have been passed in recent years.
The Real Estate Division has instituted some
tougher rules for loan officers and managers designed
to make them more accountable for the loans they
originate.
For example, under legislation passed last year,
lending managers who supervise mortgage loan officers
are now required to obtain a license and be accountable
for the lending officers they supervise. And all
loan officers must now be affiliated with a supervisor. |